| NATS 101 Lecture 26 Weather Forecasting 2 |
| Review: Key Concepts |
| There are several types of forecasts | |
| Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) | |
| Use computer models to forecast weather | |
| -Analysis Phase … | |
| -Prediction Phase … | |
| -Post-Processing Phase … | |
| Humans modify computer forecasts |
| Suite of Official NWS Forecasts |
| 3-Month
SST Forecast Most recent |
| SST forecasts for the El Nino region of tropical Pacific are a crucial component of seasonal and yearly forecasts. | |
| Forecasts of El Nino and La Nina show skill out to around 12 months. | |
| 1997-98 El Nino forecast was fairly accurate once El Nino was established |
| Winter 2007-2008
Outlook latest prediction |
| Winter 2004-2005
Outlook (Issued 18 March 2004) |
| Winter 2004-2005
Outlook (Issued 18 March 2004) |
| NCEP GFS Forecasts |
| ATMO GFS Link | |
| NCEP global forecast; 4 times per day | |
| Run on 50 km grid (approximately) | |
| GFS gives the best 2-10 day forecasts | |
| NCEP GFS Forecasts |
| ATMO NAM Link | |
| NCEP CONUS forecast; 4 times per day | |
| Run on 12 km grid (approximately) | |
| NAM gives the best 24 h precip forecasts | |
| Different Forecast Models |
| Different, but equally defensible models produce different forecast evolutions for the same event. | |
| Although details of the evolutions differ, the large-waves usually evolve very similarly out to 2 days. |
| Forecast Evaluation: Accuracy and Skill |
| Accuracy measures the closeness of a forecast value to a verifying observation | |
| Accuracy can be measured by many metrics | |
| Skill compares the accuracy of a forecast against the accuracy of a competing forecast | |
| A forecast must beat simple competitors: | |
| Persistence, Climatology, Random, etc. | |
| If forecasts consistently beat these competitors, then the forecasts are said to be ÒskillfulÓ |
| How Humans Improve Forecasts |
| Local geography in models is smoothed out. | |
| Model forecasts contain small, regional biases. | |
| Model surface temperatures must be adjusted, and local rainfall probabilities must be forecast based on experience and statistical models. | |
| Small-scale features, such as thunderstorms, must be inferred from long-time experience. | |
| If model forecast appears systematically off, human corrects it using current information. |
| Humans Improve Model Forecasts |
| Forecasters perform better than automated model and statistical forecasts for 24 and 48 h. | |
| Human forecasters play an important role in the forecasting process, especially during severe weather situations that impact public safety. |
| Current Skill |
| 0-12 hrs: Can track individual severe storms | |
| 12-48 hrs: Can predict daily weather changes well, including regions threatened by severe weather. | |
| 3-5 days: Can predict major winter storms, excessive heat and cold snaps. Rainfall forecasts are less accurate. | |
| 6-15 days: Can predict average temp and rain over 5 day period well, but daily changes are not forecast well. | |
| 30-90 days: Some skill for average temp but not so much for rainfall over period. Forecasts use combination of model forecasts and statistical relationships (e.g. El Nino). | |
| 90-360 days: ÒSlightÓ skill for SST anomalies. |
| Why NWP Forecasts Go Awry |
| There are inherent flaws in all NWP models that limit the accuracy and skill of forecasts | |
| Computer models idealize the atmosphere | |
| Assumptions can be on target for some situations and way off target for others |
| Why NWP Forecasts Go Awry |
| All analyses contain errors | |
| Regions with sparse or low quality observations | |
| - Oceans have ÒpoorerÓ data than continents | |
| Instruments contain measurement error | |
| - A 20oC reading does not exactly equal 20oC | |
| Even a precise measurement at a point location might not accurately represent the big picture | |
| - Radiosonde ascent through isolated cumulus |
| Why NWP Forecasts Go Awry |
| Insufficient resolution | |
| Weather features smaller than the grid point spacing do not exist in computer forecasts | |
| Interactions between the resolved larger scales and the excluded smaller scales are absent | |
| Inadequate representations of physical processes such as friction and heating | |
| Energy and moisture transfer at the earth's surface are not precisely known |
| Chaos: Limits to Forecasting |
| We now know that even if our models were perfect, it would still be impossible to predict precisely winter storms beyond 10-14 days | |
| There are countless, undetected small errors in our initial analyses of the atmosphere | |
| These small disturbances grow with time as the computer projects farther into the future | |
| Lorenz posed, ÒDoes the flap of a butterflyÕs wings in Brazil set off a tornado in Texas?Ó |
| Chaos: Limits to Forecasting |
| After a few days, these initial imperfections dominate forecasts, rendering it useless. | |
| Chaotic physical systems are characterized by unpredictable behavior due to their sensitivity to small changes in initial state. | |
| Evolutions of chaotic systems in nature might appear random, but they are bounded. | |
| Although bounded, they are unpredictable. |
| Chaos: Kleenex Example |
| Drop a Kleenex to the floor | |
| Drop a 2nd Kleenex, releasing it from the same spot | |
| Drop a 3rd Kleenex, releasing it from the same spot, etc. | |
| Repeat procedureÉ1,000,000 times if you like, even try moving closer to the floor | |
| Does a Kleenex ever land in the same place as a prior drop? | |
| Kleenex exhibits chaotic behavior! |
| Atmospheric Predictability |
| The atmosphere is like a falling Kleenex! | |
| The uncertainty in the initial conditions grow during the evolution of a weather forecast. | |
| So a point forecast made for a long time will ultimately be worthless, no better than a guess! | |
| There is a limited amount of predictability, but only for a short period of time. | |
| Loss of predictability is an attribute of nature. It is not an artifact of computer models. |
| Limits of Predictability |
| What determines the limits of predictability for the atmosphere? | |
| Limits dependent on many factors such as: | |
| Flow regime | |
| Geographic location | |
| Spatial scale of disturbance | |
| Weather element |
| Sensitivity to Initial Conditions |
| Summary: Key Concepts |
| NCEP issues forecasts out to a season. | |
| Human forecasters improve NWP forecasts. | |
| NWP forecast go awry for several reasons: | |
| measurement and analysis errors | |
| insufficient model resolution | |
| incomplete understanding of physics | |
| chaotic behavior and predictability | |
| Chaos always limits forecast skill. |
| Assignment for Next Lecture |
| Topic - Thunderstorms | |
| Reading - Ahrens pg 257-271 | |
| Problems – | |
| 10.1, 10.3, 10.4, 10.5, 10.6, 10.7, 10.16 |