Tuesday Sep. 8, 2009
click here to download today's notes in a more printer friendly format

Three songs from The Doors today before class:  "Love Me Two Times", "Soul Kitchen", and "Love Her Madly."

The Practice Quiz is on Thursday this week, not on Sept. 24 as the class home page had incorrectly indicated.  There are reviews scheduled for this afternoon from 4-5 pm in Haury (Anthropology) 129 and Wednesday afternoon from 4-5 pm in FCS (Family and Consumer Sciences) 225.  It's the old FCS building on 4th St. about halfway between Highland and Park.

You'll get the Haiku optional assignments back on Thursday most likely.


OK we'll finish up the subject of climate change and global warming in class today.
Here's where we left off last Thursday:

The atmospheric concentration of CO2 has been increasing since the middle 1700s.  Today we'll learn how humans have been able to cause such a change.  We'll need to find out what natural and man-caused processes add CO2 to the air and what processes remove it.  Then the obvious question is what has global average temperature been doing during this same period.  I.e. has the increase in greenhouse gas concentrations strengthened the greenhouse effect and warmed the earth?


Here's a list of natural and anthropogenic (man-caused) processes that release CO2 into the air and remove it from the atmosphere.



Carbon dioxide is added to the atmosphere naturally by respiration (people breathe in oxygen and exhale carbon dioxide), decay, and volcanoes (volcanoes was added after class). 

Combustion of fossil fuels, a human activity also adds CO2 to the atmosphere.  Deforestation, cutting down and killing a tree will prevent the tree from removing CO2 from the air by photosynthesis.  The dead tree will also decay and release CO2 to the air (the cut trees are sometimes also burned, that's combustion again and adds CO2 to the air).

CO2 is removed from the atmosphere by photosynthesis.  CO2 also dissolves in the oceans.

The ? means your instructor is not aware of an anthropogenic process that removes significant amounts of carbon dioxide from the air.  This is something that people are beginning to think about and work on (see carbon sequestration).


We are now able to better understand the yearly variation in atmospheric CO2 concentration (the "wiggles" on the Keeling Curve).




In the bottom graph we assume that the release of CO2 to the air remains constant throughout the year (the straight horizontal brown line).  Photosynthesis will change.  Photosynthesis is highest in the summer when plants are growing actively.  It is lowest in the winter when many plants are dead or dormant. 

Atmospheric CO2 concentration will decrease as long as the rate of removal (photosynthesis) is greater than the rate of release (blue shaded portion above).  Your bank account balance will drop as long as you spend more money than you deposit.  The minimum occurs at the right end of the blue shaded portion where removal once again equals release (where the green and brown lines intersect).

The CO2 concentration will increase when release exceeds removal (red shaded sections).  The highest CO2 concentration occurs at the right end of the red shaded portion.

To really understand why human activities are causing atmospheric CO2 concentration to increase we need to look at the relative amounts of CO2 being added to and being removed from the atmosphere.  A simplified version of the carbon cycle is shown below (this is a little more neatly drawn version of what was done in class)


Here are the main points to take from this figure:

1.   
The underlined numbers show the amount of carbon stored in "reservoirs."  For example 760 units* of carbon are stored in the atmosphere (predominantly in the form of CO2, but also in small amounts of CH4 (methane), CFCs and other gases; anything that contains carbon).  You don't need to remember the actual number just realize that the atmosphere is a pretty small reservoir.

    The other numbers show "fluxes," the the rates of movement of carbon moving into or out of the atmosphere.  Over land, respiration and decay add 120 units* of carbon to the atmosphere every year.  Photosynthesis (primarily) removes 120 units every year.

2.    Note the natural processes are in balance (over land: 120 units added and 120 units removed, over the oceans: 90 units added balanced by 90 units of carbon removed from the atmosphere every year). If these were the only processes present, the atmospheric concentration (760 units) wouldn't change.

3.   
Anthropogenic (man caused) emissions of carbon into the air are small compared to natural processes.  About 6.4 units are added during combustion of fossil fuels and 1.6 units are added every year because of deforestation.

The rate at which carbon is added to the atmosphere by man is not balanced by an equal rate of removal: 4.4 of the 8 units added every year are removed (highlighted in yellow in the figure).  This small imbalance (8 - 4.4 = 3.6 units of carbon are left in the atmosphere every year) explains why atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations are increasing with time.


4.   
In the next 100 years or so, the 7500 units of carbon stored in the fossil fuels reservoir (lower left hand corner of the figure) might be dug up or pumped out of the ground and burned.  That will add 7500 units of carbon to the air.  The big question is how will the atmospheric concentration change and what effects will that have on climate?

*don't worry about the units.  But here they are just in case you are interested:
 Reservoirs - Gtons
 Fluxes - Gtons/year
  A Gton = 1012 metric tons. (1 metric ton is 1000 kilograms or about 2200 pounds)


So here's where we're at
in our discussion of climate change and global warming:
Atmospheric CO2 concentration was fairly constant between 1000 AD and the mid 1700s.
CO2 concentration has been increasing since the mid 1700s (other greenhouse gas concentrations have also been increasing).
The concern is that this might enhance or strengthen the greenhouse effect and cause global warming. 

The obvious question is what has the temperature of the earth been doing during this period?  In particular has there been any warming associated with the increases in greenhouse gases that have occurred since the mid 1700s?

We must address the temperature question in two parts.


First part:

Actual accurate measurements of temperature (on land and at sea)





This figure is based on actual measurements of temperature made (using reliable thermometers) at many locations on land and sea around the globe.  The figure shows the overall change in global average annual surface temperature since about 1860.

Temperature appears to have increased 0.7o to 0.8o C during this period.  The increase hasn't been steady as you might have expected given the steady rise in CO2 concentration; temperature even decreased slightly between about 1940 and 1970.

It is very difficult to detect a temperature change this small over this period of time.  The instruments used to measure temperature have changed.  The locations at which temperature measurements have been made have also changed (imagine what Tucson was like 130 years ago).  About 2/3rds of the earth's surface is ocean and measurements were pretty sparce (sea surface temperatures can now be measured using satellites). Average surface temperatures naturally change a lot from year to year. 

The year to year variation has been left out of the figure above so that the overall trend could be seen more clearly.  The figure below does show the year to year variation (dotted black line) and the uncertainties (green bars, note how the uncertainty is lower in recent years) in the yearly measurements.





These data are from the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies site.

Temperatures here are compared to the 1951-1980 mean. 
Temperatures prior to about 1930 were colder than the 1951-1980 mean and temperatures after 1980 were warmer.

Here's another plot of global temperature change over a slightly longer time period from a different research group.
These data are from the University of East Anglia Climatic Research Unit






The overall tendency seems to be the same in both cases.

2nd part

Now it would be interesting to know how temperature was changing prior to the mid-1800s.  This is similar to what happened when the scientists wanted to know what carbon dioxide concentrations looked like prior to 1958.  In that case they were able to go back and analyze air samples from the past (air trapped in bubbles in ice sheets). 

That doesn't work with temperature.

Imagine putting some air in a bottle, sealing the bottle, putting the bottle on a shelf, and letting it sit for 100 years.  In 2109 you could take the bottle down from the shelf, carefully remove the air, and measure what the CO2 concentration in the air had been in 2009 when the air was sealed in the bottle.  You couldn't, in 2109, use the air in the bottle to determine what the temperature of the air was when it was originally put into the bottle in 2009.

With temperature
you need to use proxy data.  You need to look for something else whose presence, concentration, or composition depended on the temperature at some time in the past.

Here's a proxy data example.
Let's say you want to determine how many students are living in a house near the university.



You could walk by the house late in the afternoon when the students might be outside and count them.  That would be a direct measurement (this would be like measuring temperature with a thermometer). There could still be some errors in your measurement (some students might be inside the house and might not be counted, some of the people outside might not live at the house).

If you were to walk by early in the morning it is likely that the students would be inside sleeping (or in one of the 8 am NATS 101 classes).  In that case you might look for other clues (such as the number of empty bottles in the yard) that might give you an idea of how many students lived in that house.  You would use these proxy data to come up with an estimate of the number of students inside the house.

In the case of temperature scientists look at a variety of things.  They could look at tree rings.  The width of each yearly ring depends on the depends on the temperature and precipitation at the time the ring formed.  They analyze coral.  Coral is made up of calcium carbonate, a molecule that contains oxygen.  The relative amounts of the oxygen-16 and oxygen-18 isotopes depends on the temperature that existed at the time the coral grew.  Scientists can analyze lake bed and ocean sediments.  The types of  plant and animal fossils that they find depend on the water temperature at the time.  They can even use the ice cores.  The ice, H2O, contains oxygen and the relative amounts of various oxygen isotopes depends on the temperature at the time the ice fell from the sky as snow.

Here's an idea of how oxygen isotope data can be used to determine past temperature.



These two isotopes of oxygen contain different numbers of neutrons in their nuclei.   Both atoms have the same number of protons.



During a cold period, the H2O16 form of water evaporates more rapidly than the H2O18 form.  You would find  relatively large amounts of O16 in glacial ice.  Since most of the H2O18 remains in the ocean, it is found in relatively high amounts in calcium carbonate in ocean sediments.  Note also the drop in ocean levels during colder periods when much of the ocean water is found in ice sheets on land.



The reverse is true during warmer periods.

Using proxy data scientists have been able to estimate average surface temperatures for 100,000s of years into the past.  The next figure (bottom of p. 3 in the photocopied Classnotes) shows what temperature has been doing since 1000 AD.  This is for the northern hemisphere only, not the globe.



The major portion of the figure shows the estimates of temperature (again relative to the 1961-1990 mean) derived from proxy data.  The instrumental measurements were made between about 1850 and the present day.  There is also a lot of year to year variation and uncertainty that is not shown on the figure above.

Many scientists would argue that this graph is strong support of a connection between rising atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations and global warming.  Early in this time interval when CO2 concentration was constant, there is little temperature change.  Temperature only begins to rise in about 1900 when we know an increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations was underway.

There is historical evidence in Europe of a medieval warm period lasting from 800 AD to - 1300 AD or so and a cold period, the "Little Ice Age, " which lasted from about 1400 AD to the mid 1800s.  These are not clearly apparent in the temperature plot above.  This leads some scientists to question the validity of this temperature reconstruction.  Scientists also suggest that if large changes in climate such as the Medieval warm period and the Little Ice Age can occur naturally, then maybe the warming that is occurring at the present time also has a natural cause.

We took a short detour at this point to see how volcanic eruptions can sometimes cause short term changes in climate (cooling).

Here's the figure that the sketch above was based on




from
Climate Change 2001 - The Scientific Basis
Contribution of Working Group I to the 3rd Assessment Report of the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 

Here's a comparison of several additional estimates of temperature changes over the past 1000 years or so




This is from the University of East Anglia Climatic Research Unit again. 
Some of these curves do show a little bit more temperature variation between 1000 AD and 1900 AD than the hockey stick plot above.

Here's a short summary that tries to separate fact from hypothesis in the debate over climate change:

There is general agreement that
    Atmospheric CO2 and other greenhouse gas concentrations are increasing and that
    The earth is warming

Not everyone agrees on
    the Causes of the warming (is the warming natural or being caused by human activities),
    how much Additional Warming there will be or how quickly it will occur, and
    what Effects that warming will have on weather and climate in the years to come




The discussion of stratospheric ozone that we started at the end of class won't be on the Practice Quiz this week.  The notes will appear online after the Practice Quiz.