Thu., Sept. 27, 2012
click here to download these notes in a more printer friendly format

A couple of songs from Playing for Change.  The first was Don't Worry and was followed by the best version of Stand By Me you'll ever hear (that's my opinion anyway).

The Experiment #1 reports have all been graded and were returned in class today.  You now have two weeks to revise your report if you want to (you don't have to).  You only need to change sections were you want to earn additional credit.  Please return the original report with your revised report.  The revised reports are due on or before Thu. Oct. 11.

A second Optional Assignment on Upper Level Charts is now available.  If you make an honest effort to answer all the questions and have the assignment done before coming to class you can earn extra credit.  If you answer at least 85% of the questions correctly you'll earn extra credit and a "Green Card."  The assignment is due next Thursday, Oct. 4.



Up to this point we've been learning about surface weather maps.  Maps showing conditions at various altitudes above the ground are also drawn.  Upper level conditions can affect the development and movement of surface features (and vice versa).  We covered some of the basic concepts at the start of the period today.  Some additional supplementary information is available online.  This supplementary reading provides all the background information you'll need to be able to answers the questions on the new optional assignment mentioned above.l

Here we'll mostly just learn 3 basic facts about upper level charts.  First the overall appearance is somewhat different from a surface weather map.  The pattern on a surface map can be complex and you generally find circular (more or less) centers of high and low pressure (see the bottom portion of the figure below).  You can also find closed high and low pressure centers at upper levels, but mostly you find a relatively simple wavy pattern like is shown on the upper portion of the figure below (sort of a 3-dimensional view).  You'll find this basic picture on p. 41 in the ClassNotes.
 

A simple upper level chart pattern is sketched below (a map view).  There are two basic features: wavy lines that dip southward and have a "u-shape" and lines that bend northward and have an "n-shape".

The u-shaped portion of the pattern is called a trough.  The n-shaped portion is called a ridge.

Troughs are produced by large volumes of cool or cold air (the cold air is found between the ground and the upper level that the map depicts).  The western half of the country in the map above would probably be experiencing colder than average temperatures.  Large volumes of warm or hot air produce ridges.  You can find out why this is true by reading "Upper level charts pt. 2".


The winds on upper level charts blow parallel to the contour lines generally from west to east.  This is a little different from surface winds which blow across the isobars toward low pressure.  An example of surface winds is shown below.



That's it for this first section.  Really all you need to be able to do is
1. identify troughs and ridges,
2. remember that troughs are associated with cold air & ridges with warm air, and
3. remember that upper level winds blow parallel to the contour lines from west to east.


Here's the earlier picture again overlaying surface and upper-level maps.



On the surface map above you see centers of HIGH and LOW pressure.  The surface low pressure center, together with the cold and warm fronts, is a middle latitude storm.

Note how the counterclockwise winds spinning around the LOW move warm air northward (behind the warm front on the eastern side of the LOW) and cold air southward (behind the cold front on the western side of the LOW).  Clockwise winds spinning around the HIGH also move warm and cold air.  The surface winds are shown with thin brown arrows on the surface map.

Note the ridge and trough features on the upper level chart.  We learned that warm air is found below an upper level ridge.  Now you can begin to see where this warm air comes from.  Warm air is found west of the HIGH and to the east of the LOW.   This is where the two ridges on the upper level chart are also found.  You expect to find cold air below an upper level trough.  This cold air is being moved into the middle of the US by the northerly winds that are found between the HIGH and the LOW. 

Note the yellow X marked on the upper level chart directly above the surface LOW.  This is a good location for a surface LOW to form, develop, and strengthen (strengthening means the pressure in the surface low will get even lower than it is now.  This is also called "deepening").  The reason for this is that the yellow X is a location where there is often upper level divergence.  Similary the pink X is where you often find upper level convergence.  This could cause the pressure in the center of the surface high pressure to get even higher.  You can read more about this in Upper level charts pt. 3.
  The upper level winds could also cause the surface storm to weaken (the low pressure would get higher).

.
The following picture  wasn't shown in class on Thursday.



One of the things we have learned about surface LOW pressure is that the converging surface winds create rising air motions.  The figure above gives you an idea of what can happen to this rising air (it has to go somewhere).  Note the two arrows of air coming into the point "DIV" and three arrows of air leaving (more air going out than coming in), this is upper level divergence).  The rising air can, in effect, supply the extra arrow's worth of air.

Three arrows of air come into the point marked "CONV" on the upper level chart and two leave (more air coming in than going out = upper level convergence).  What happens to the extra arrow?  It sinks, it is the source of the sinking air found above surface high pressure.



OK we're done with weather maps for the time being.  Though if interesting weather appears imminent I'll try to mention it in class (earlier in the week  it looked like the remnants of Hurricane Miriam might bring some rainy weather to Tucson this weekend, but that no longer seems to be the case).



The plot above at left shows the forecasted path of Hurricane Miriam on Monday.  At the time it looked like the storm was headed toward southern Arizona.  Miriam was a Category 3 hurricane (on a scale that runs from 1 to 5) and had winds of 120 MPH.  The figure at right shows the forecasted path this morning.  Miriam is now a tropical storm with sustained winds of 40 MPH.


If we were using a textbook in this class we'd be moving into Chapter 2!  During the next couple of weeks we will be concerned with energy, temperature, heat, energy transport, and energy balance between the earth, atmosphere, and space.

It is easy to lose sight of the main concepts because there are so many details.  Most of the following figures are found on pps 43&44 in the photocopied ClassNotes.

Types of energy
We will learn the names of several different types or forms of energy.

Kinetic energy is energy of motion. Some examples (both large and microscopic scale) are mentioned and sketched above.  This is a relatively easy to visualize and understand form of energy.



Latent heat energy is an underappreciated and rather confusing type of energy. The word latent refers to energy that is hidden in water and water vapor.  The hidden energy emerges when water vapor condenses or water freezes (the energy had been added earlier when ice was melted or water was evaporated).  The fact that the energy is hidden is part of what makes it confusing.





Radiant energy is a very important form of energy that was for some reason left off the original list in the ClassNotes.  Sunlight is an example of radiant energy that we can see and feel (you feel warm when you stand in sunlight).  There are many types of radiant energy that are invisible (such as the infrared light that people emit - something I didn't mention in class).  Electromagnetic radiation is another name for radiant energy.

Energy transport
Four energy transport processes are listed below.

 

By far the most important process is at the bottom of the list above.  Energy transport in the form of electromagnetic radiation (sunlight is a common form of electromagnetic radiation) is the only process that can transport energy through empty space.  Electromagnetic radiation travels both to the earth (from the sun) and away from the earth back into space.  Electromagnetic radiation is also responsible for about 80% of the energy transported between the ground and atmosphere.

You might be surprised to learn that latent heat is the second most important transport process.

Rising parcels of warm air and sinking parcels of cold air are examples of free convection.  Because of convection you feel colder or a cold windy day than on a cold calm day (the wind chill effect).  Ocean currents are also an example of convection.  Ocean currents transport energy from the warm tropics to colder polar regions.

Convection is a 3rd way of causing rising air motions in the atmosphere (convergence into centers of low pressure and fronts are other 2 ways we've encountered so far) 

Conduction is the least important energy transport at least in the atmosphere.  Air is such a poor conductor of energy that it is generally considered to be an insulator.

Energy balance and the atmospheric greenhouse effect
The next picture (the figure in the ClassNotes has been split into three parts for improved clarity) shows energy being transported from the sun to the earth in the form of electromagnetic radiation.



We are aware of this energy because we can see it (sunlight also contains invisible forms of light) and feel it.  With all of this energy arriving at and being absorbed by the earth, what keeps the earth from getting hotter and hotter?  If you park your car in the sun it will heat up.  But there is a limit to how hot it will get.  Why is that? 

It might be helpful when talking about energy balance to think of a bank account.  If you periodically deposit money into your account why doesn't the balance just grow without limit.  The answer is that you also take money out of the account and spend it.  The same is true of energy and the earth.  The earth absorbs incoming sunlight energy but also emits energy back into space (the orange and pink arrows in the figure below).  Energy is being emitted by both the surface of the earth and the atmosphere.




Energy is emitted in the form of infrared light is an invisible form of energy (it is weak enough that we don't usually feel it either).  A balance between incoming and outgoing energy is achieved and the earth's annual average temperature remains constant.

We will also look closely at energy transport between the earth's surface and the atmosphere (see the figure below). This is where latent heat energy transport, convection and conduction operate (they can't transport energy beyond the atmosphere and into outer space).


That is also where the atmospheric greenhouse functions.  That will be a important goal - to better understand how the atmospheric greenhouse effect works.


The greenhouse effect is getting a lot of "bad press".  If the earth's atmosphere didn't contain greenhouse gases and if there weren't a greenhouse effect, the global annual average surface temperature would be about 0 F (scratch out -4 F and put 0 F, it's easier to remember).  Greenhouse gases raise this average to about 60 F and make the earth a much more habitable place.  That is the beneficial side of the greenhouse effect.

The detrimental side is that atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations are increasing (no real debate about that).  This might enhance or strengthen the greenhouse effect and cause the earth to warm (some debate here particularly about how much  warmer there might be).  While that doesn't necessarily sound bad it could have many unpleasant side effects (lots of debate and uncertainty about this also).  That's a subject we'll explore briefly later in the semester.



We kind of rushed through the remaining material - I apologize for that.  Here's a picture of me back in my office banging my head against a wall which is what I do in cases like that.

I was in a hurry because I wanted to have time for an experiment at the end of class.  And then after I've hit my head a few time I try to make amends and explain the material more clearly on the online notes.

When you add energy to an object, the object will usually warm up (or if you take energy from an object the object will cool).  It is relatively easy to come up with an equation that allows you to figure out what the temperature change will be (this is another equation I'll write on the board before  the next quiz if you ask me to - try to understand it, you don't have to memorize it).





The temperature change, ΔT,  will first depend on how much energy was added, ΔE.  This is a direct proportionality, so ΔE is in the numerator of the equation (ΔE and ΔT are both positive when energy is added, negative when energy is removed)

When you add equal amounts of energy to large and small  pans of water, the small pan will heat up more quickly.  The temperature change, ΔT, will depend on the amount of water, the mass.  A small mass will mean a large ΔT, so mass should go in the denominator of the equation. 

Specific heat is what we use to account for the fact that different materials react differently when energy is added to them.  A material with a large specific heat will warm more slowly than a material with a small specific heat.  Specific heat has the same kind of effect on ΔT as mass.  Specific heat is sometimes called "thermal mass" or "thermal capacity."  You can think of specific heat as being thermal inertia - a substance with high specific heat, lots of thermal inertia, will be reluctant to change temperature.

Here's an important example that will show the effect of specific heat (middle of p. 45).


Equal amounts of energy (1000 calories, note that calories are units of energy) are added to equal masses (500 grams) of water and soil.  We use water and soil in the example because most of the earth's surface is either ocean or land. Before we do the calculation, try to guess which material will warm up the most.  Everything is the same except for the specific heats.  Will water with its 5 times larger specific heat warm up more or less than the soil?

Here are the details of the calculation.

With its higher specific heat, the water doesn't heat up nearly as much as the soil.  If we had been removing energy the wouldn't cool off as much as the soil would.

These different rates of warming of water and soil have important effects on regional climate.


Oceans moderate the climate.  Cities near a large body of water won't warm as much in the summer and won't cool as much during the winter compared to a city that is surrounded by land.  Water's ΔT is smaller than land's because water has higher specific heat.
The yearly high and low monthly average temperatures are shown at two locations above.  The city on the coast has a 30o F annual range of temperature (range is the difference between the summer and winter temperatures).  The city further inland (assumed to be at the same latitude and altitude) has an annual range of 60o F.  Note that both cities have the same 60o F annual average temperature.  We'll see a much more dramatic example of the moderating effect of water on climate in a couple of weeks.


Here's another situation where you can take advantage of water's high specific heat to moderate "micro climate."  We didn't have time to discuss this in class.



I usually plant tomatoes in my vegetable garden in February so that they can start to make tomatoes before it starts to get too hot in May.  In February it can still get cold enough to kill tomatoes (the brocolli and lettuce in the background can handle a light frost) so you have to protect them.



Here's one way of doing that.  You can surround each plant with a "wall o water"  -  a teepee like arrangement that surrounds each plant.  The cylinders are filled with water and they take advantage of the high specific heat of water and won't cool as much as the air or soil would during a cold night.  The walls of water produce a warm moist microclimate that the tomato seedlings love.  The plastic is transparent so plenty of sunlight can get through.


Adding energy to an object will usually cause it to warm.  But there is another possibility (bottom p. 45),  the object could change phase (change from solid to liquid or gas).  Adding energy to ice might cause the ice to melt.  Adding energy to water could cause it to evaporate.  We hurried through this a little bit in class.


The equation at the bottom of the figure above allows you to calculate how much energy is required to melt ice or evaporate water or sublimate dry ice.  You multiply the mass by the latent heat, a variable that depends on the particular material that is changing phase.  The latent heat of vaporization (evaporation) is the energy required to evaporate 1 gram of a material.



If you add energy to or remove energy from an object, the object will usually change temperature.  You can calculate the temperature change if you know the object's mass and its specific heat.  That's the equation we used in the example calculation above.  It's shown again below.



We conducted an experiment in the last part of the class and we needed to be able to measure ΔE.  We'll stick a thermometer into the object and measure any changes in temperature that occur.


If you know the mass and specific heat of an object and measure a change in temperature you can use the rearranged equation in the figure above to calculate how much energy was added to or removed from the object.


And on to the in-class experiment.  A couple of groups of students from the class were nice enough to volunteer to perform the experiment.  They'll  be able to write a report about the experiment and use the data you collected to satisfy the Experiment Report part of the Writing Requirements.  I.e. they won't have to worry about checking out materials and doing Expt. #1, #2, or #3.  A couple of the students had done Expt. #1.  I got to thinking after class that they deserved something for their effort and I think I'll give them each a Green Card.

Here's the object of the experiment:



The students that are doing Experiment #2 are doing something similar, they are measuring the latent heat of fusion of ice, the energy needed to melt one gram of ice. 

Here's the data that one of the groups collected in class.  This will be hard to figure out even after having cleaned things up a bit after class.




So here's a step by step explanation of what the students did:
(a)



Some room temperature water poured into a styrofoam cup weighed 188.1 g.  The cup itself weighed 4.1 g, so they had 184.0 g of water.  The water's temperature was measured with the thermometer and was 23.0 C (room temperature).

(b)
Some liquid nitrogen was poured into a second smaller styrofoam cup.  That weighed 44.0 g.  Subtracting the 2.1 g weight of the cup means we had 49.1 g of liquid nitrogen. 

We don't need to measure the temperature of the liquid nitrogen (doing so would probably destroy the thermometer).  It had already warmed up as much as it ccould ( to -320 F or something like that).  Any additional energy added to the liquid nitrogen will cause it to evaporate.

(c)
After the liquid nitrogen had evaporated the water's temperature was remeasured.  It had dropped to 11.0 C. 


We started out with water that was 23.0 C, so that is a temperature drop of 12.0 C.


It takes energy to turn liquid nitrogen into nitrogen gas.  The energy needed will be taken from the water (the red arrow below, energy naturally flows from hot to cold). 


Because the experiment was performed in an insulated sytrofoam cup we will assume all of the energy taken from the water is used to evaporate nitrogen.  Minimal energy flows into the room air or anything like that.  We will set the two equations above equal to each other.  This is an energy balance equation.

We know the mass of the nitrogen that we started with and that was eventually evaporated (41.9 g) and the mass of the water (184.0 g).  We measured the ΔT (12.0 C) and we know the specific heat of water (1 cal/g C).  We substitute them into the equation above and solve for LH, the latent heat of vaporization of liquid nitrogen.  Here are the details of the calculation:
A responsible & trustworthy student in the class (though not a Buddhist monk it turns out) informed us that the known value is 48 cal/g, so this measured value is pretty close to the known value.