Tuesday
Jan.
18,
2011
click here to download these notes in a more
printer friendly format
Today's class was a brief overview of some of the
important historical developments in Atmospheric Electricity (mostly
contributions
from
Benjamin
Franklin)
Lightning was feared and often seen as a form
of punishment (though also sometimes associated with fertility - eg.
birth of twins)
“symbols based on the concept of fire are
among the oldest
pictorial representations of lightning.”ref (1, see the end of today's notes for a complete reference)
“In many ethnological representations from
prehistoric times
lightning is depicted …. as a stone falling from heaven or a stone axe
hurled
from the skies.”ref(1)
“French peasants carry a “pierre de tonnerre” in their pockets
to ward
off lightning during thunderstorms” ref (1)
Next time I'm in France I'm going to try to find one of those, though
I'm beginning to wonder if this isn't the same as a fulgurite.
We spent most of the period describing some of the contributions made
by Benjamin Franklin (born Jan. 17, 1706 in
Boston, died April 17, 1790 in Philadelphia). I know very little
about him but have sat in on several lectures delivered by Dr.
Krider. A large part of what is in today's notes comes from notes
that I took during his lectures. You'll also find an article
about Franklin written by Dr. Krider here.
Franklin actively experimented
with electricity for
only a few years starting in the 1740s & continuing into the early
1750s.
There were many people in the American
Colonies and Europe that were interested in and
actively studying
electricity at the time. Franklin
(emulated Newton)
&
performed
experiments
to
test
his
theories.
Electrostatic machines (friction machines)
were fairly
common
at the time (see
Wikipedia)
Peter Collinson –
unpaid London
agent of the
Philadelphia Library Company gave Franklin a
glass-rubbing tube in late
1746.
Early machines often used some
material (silk or wool?) rubbing against a spinning glass sphere or a
glass
cylinder. The glass would acquire one charge, the rubbing surface
the other polarity. (here's my interpration of the
French phrase at the bottom of the figure:
"I know, where is best found this almost magical virtue, wisely named
electric; young beauties it's in your eyes.")
Construction of an electrostatic machine of some kind would
make a suitable project for this class.
“By being
removed so far from the European centres of
experimentation and discussion of electrical events.Franklin
was able to view his own observation with a freshness not encumbered by
the
earlier notions of others.He therefore
regarded an electrically undisturbed body as being under neutral charge
or as
in a state of electrical equilibrium."
ref
(2)
Franklin believed (correctly) that rubbing two materials together did
not create electricity. Rather, the rubbing somehow or another
"grabbed onto" and separated charges that already were part of the
neutral materials. Material 1 might "tear" electrons from
material 2. Material 1 would become negatively charged and
material 2 would be left positively charged.
Priestley explains this more clearly and succintly:
“Dr.
Franklin
had discovered … that the electric matter was
not created but collected by friction, from the neighbouring non
electric
bodies”
Priestley was the first historian
of electrical
science.His “History and Present State
of Electricity” appeared in London
in 1767.
Leyden
Jar
capacitors were used to store electrical charges produced by the
friction
machines. A "dissectable" Leyden jar was shown in class.
The Wimhurst generator
was
developed between 1800 and 1883 by a British inventor. Leyden
jars are shown on the right and left (photo from
Wikipedia)
We used a Van de
Graaff generator to produce high voltages needed for a few class
demonstrations.
I forgot to mention the Kelvin water dropper in class. This
is another apparatus that is able to separate and accumulate charge.
We have a couple of mostly constructed Kelvin water droppers that
could be used for a class project.
We'll concentrate on three of Franklin's contributions:
(1) the power of points
(2) noticing and suggesting a means of verifying that the electricity
in thunderstorms and lightning was the same as the electricty produced
by the electrostatic machines and being studied in the laboratory, and
(3) his invention of lightning rods.
Priestley
“He (Franklin) was properly the first
who observed the entire and
wonderful effect of pointed bodies, both in drawing and throwing off
the
electric fire.”
Franklin
“The first is the wonderful effect of
pointed bodies, both
in drawing off and throwing off the electrical fire.”
This was demonstrated using a Van de Graaff
generator
As soon as a pointed, grounded brass rod is
brought to within about 20 centimeters of the Van de Graaff, the
sparking to the grounded round ball stops.
Franklin saw many similarities between the electricity
used
in his experiments and lightning.
Both produce light, and the colors of light are similar. Crooked
channels. Swift motion. Being conducted by metals. Crack or
noise produced during discharge. "Subsisting" in water or ice.
"Rending" bodies as current passes through. Killing
animals. Melting metals. Catching inflammable materials on fire.
Sulphurous smell.
He wondered whether lightning
wasn't just a much larger scale form of the same phenomenon and
proposed the following experiment (the Sentry box experiment was
described in a July 29, 1750 letter)
"To determine the question, whether the
clouds that contain
lightning are electrified or not, I would propose an experiment to be
tried
where it may be done conveniently.On
the top of some high tower or steeple, place a kind of sentry-box big
enough to
contain a man and an electrical stand.From the middle of the stand let an iron rod rise and pass
bending out
of the door, and then upright 20 or 30 feet, pointed very sharp at the
end.If the electrical stand be kept
clean and dry a man standing on it when such clouds are :passing low,
might be
electrified and afford sparks, the rod drawing fire to him from a cloud.If any danger to the man should be
apprehended (though I think there would be none) let him stand on the
floor of
his box, and now and then bring near to the rod the loop of a wire that
has one
end fastened to the leads, he holding it by a wax handle; so the
sparks, if the
rod is electrified, will strike from the rod to the wire, and not
affect him.”
figure above is from Uman's 187 book "The Lightning Discharge."
The experiment was performed for the
first time on May 10, 1752 in
Marly-la-Ville (near Paris) by a retired dragoon name Coiffier (Thomas
Francois
Dalibard, a naturalist, was absent). Dalibard read an account of
the experiment to the French Academie des Sciences on May 13,
1752.
“En suivant la route que M.
Franklin
nous a tracé, j’ai
obtenu une satisfaction complète.Voice
les
préparatifs,
le
procédé
et
le
succès.
The experiment was repeated for the French king, Louis XV, a
short time
later.
The experiment was widely repeated
LeMonnier held a 5 m wooden pole with
iron wire windings
while standing on pitchcake.Sparks from
hands and face.
Franklin
never did the sentry box experiment (he thought the metal rod would
need to be
higher and came up with the idea of using a kite)
This figure is also from Uman's 1987 book "The Lightning Discharge"
The experiment is thought to have been conducted in June,
1752, but the exact date and location were never
recorded. Details of the experiment were sent to
Collinson in a letter dated Oct. 19, 1752.
Other people began to repeat the experiment using
rockets
(mortars) and balloons. In June 1753 de Romas used a kite with a
240 m cord wrapped with violin wire. He produced 20 cm long
sparks. Apparently later was able to produce 3 m long sparks!
The strength of the electricity was often judged by simulating the
muscles of animals and observing their reaction.
from Ref (1)
Both the sentry box experiment and the kite experiment are very
dangerous. If lightning were to strike the metal pole or the kite
or balloon, the person at the bottom would likely be killed. This
did eventually happen
Figure from ref (2)
Franklin
came up with the idea of lightning rods
“There is
something however in the experiments of points,
sending off, or drawing on, the electrical fire, which has not been
fully
explained, and which I intend to supply in my next. For the doctrine of
points
is very curious, and the effect of them truly wonderful; and, from what
I have
observed on experiments, I am of opinion, that houses, ships, and even
towns and
churches may be effectually secured from the stroke of lightning by
their
means; for if, instead of the round balls of wood or metal, which are
commonly
placed on the tops of the weather-cocks, vanes or spindles of churches,
spires,
or masts, there should be put a rod of ion 8 or 10 feet in length,
sharpen’d
gradually to a point like a needle, and gilt to prevent rusting, or
dividedinto a number of points, which
would be better – the electrical fire, would, I think, be drawn out of
a cloud
silently, before it could come near enough to strike; only a light
would be
seen at this point, like the sailors corpusante.”
“I
say,
if
these things are so, may not the knowledge of
this power of points be of use to mankind, in preserving houses,
churches, ship
etc. from the stroke of lightning, by directing us to fix on the
highest parts
of those edifices, upright rods of iron made sharp as a needle, and
gilt to
prevent rusting, and from the foot of those rods a wire down the
outside of the
bulding into the ground, or down round one of the shrounds of a ship,
and down
her side till it reaches the water?”
and my favorite:
"It has pleased God in his goodness to mankind, at length to discover
to them the means of securing their habitations and other buildings
from mischief by thunder and lightning ..."
Franklin was anticipating opposition from religious authorities because
lightning was considered by many to be a form of divine retribution.
Franklin originally thought
(incorrectly) a lightning rod would dissipate electricity (the pointed
tip would draw off electricity before a discharge could occur).
The
first strike to one of Franklins rods melted the top of the rod which
surprised
him.
Metal (nail) rods were often linked together as shown
below
(some fragments of Franklin's original lightning rods still exist, in
one case inside a building and next to dry wooden beams). The
links tended to rupture.
As problems became apparent Franklin worked to make
improvements. In particular he investigated the following:
how does the rod work?
what material should be used?
termination in air
grounding
attachment to structure
height above the structure
area protected by the rod
Considerable opposition to the
use of lightning rods in Europe. They didn't believe that it
would dissipate the electricity (correct). Franklin argued that
even if not, the lightning rod and wire to ground would safely carry
the lightning current around and thereby protect the structure.
"Ligtning had been regarded as a divine expression, a
manifestation against which there could be no possible protection,
except prayer and the ringing of church bells. Such bells cast in
mediaeval times often bore the legend "Fulgura frango"
("I break up the lightning"). With the passage of time, however,
it was realized that bell ringing during a storm was a very hazardous
remedy, especially for the ringer on the ropes becuase so many were
killed by the very stroke they attempted to disperse." In 33
years of lightning strokes on 386 church steeples 103 bell-ringers were
killed. ref (2)
A showdown took place in the Piazza in Siena Italy in
Spring
1777. One side doubted the electrical nature of lightning and the
efficacy of lightning rods. A second, more progressive side, had
ordered a lightning rods to be installed on the cathedral and the tower
of City Hall (facing the plaza where the famous Palio is
run). "On the afternoon of 18 April clouds began to form, distant
thunder was heard, and the Siennese began moving to their Piazza with
all eyes focused on the lightning rod tip. At about five o'clock
- lightning struck. A ball of fire, accompanied by sparks, smoke,
and an odor of sulphur ran the full length of the tower and disappeared
into the ground leaveing the tower unharmed."
Lightning rods were quickly adopted throughout Italy (and
also in other Catholic countries because they were approved by The Pope)
A lightning house, a common demonstration of the efficacy
of
lightning rods
It is hard to appreciate the acclaim that Franklin's ideas
and experiments in electricity brought to him in Europe (though he did
also have some enemies)
May 1752 Congratulations from the King of France
July 1753 Master of Arts from Harvard University
Sept. 1753 Master of Arts from Yale University
Nov. 1753 Copeley Gold Medal, Royal Society, London
April 1756 Fellow (w/o fee) of the Royal Society
Feb. 1759 University of St. Andrews Scotland Doctor of Civil and Canon
Laws
April 1762 Oxford Doctor of Civil Laws
Note the Franklin chimes (center left) and a grounded lightning rod
(window)
The Franklin chimes apparatus used in class consisted of a center bell
surrounded by 4 outer bells. The four outer bells were all
connected together electrically. The center bell was insulated
from the outer bells.
The small metal ball hung between each of the outer bells and the
center bell. The small balls were assumed initially to be
uncharged.
The top of the Van de Graaff generator was connected to the outer
bells. We assume a positive charge. This causes charges to
be induced on the surface of each of the balls as shown in the figure
(these
charges make the electric field inside the ball zero). The balls
will be attracted toward the outer bells.
Once the ball contacts the center bell, the negative charge is
neutralized. The positively charged ball is repelled by the
center bell.
Once the ball touches the grounded bell, the positive charge flows to
ground.
The ball is again uncharged. The whole process repeats
itself. The motion of the ball is transporting charge from the
center bell (i.e. from the Van de Graaff generator ) to ground.
The Volta Hailstorm apparatus consisted of two metal disks mounted
above each other. They were mounted inside a clear plastic
cylinder. Small round balls made of aluminum foil
were inside. The apparatus was placed on top of a Van de Graaff
generator. The foil balls are in contact with the top
electrode and acquire some charge (assumed to be positive).
The balls are repelled by the bottom electrode and travel up to the top
metal disk. They transfer their charge to the top disk and then
fall back to the bottom disk.
The charge on the top disk bleeds off into the air through the
pieces of wire connected to the disk (the charge eventually
travels to ground and completes the circuit). The foil balls
again
acquire charge from the bottom disk and the whole process repeats
itself.
References
(1) H. Prinz, Lightning in History, Ch. 1 in Lightning Vol. 1,
ed. by R.H. Golde, Academic Press, London, 1977.
(2) B. Dibner, Benjamin Franklin, Lightning, Ch. 2 in Lightning Vol. 1,
ed. by R.H. Golde, Academic Press, London, 1977.