This is a southern hemisphere upper level center of high
pressure. You should be able to figure out how the winds
will blow in this case. You'll find the answer
at the end of today's notes.
Upper level winds blow parallel to the contour lines.
Now we'll try to understand why friction causes surface winds to
blow across the contour lines (always toward low pressure).
The top figure shows upper level winds blowing
parallel to straight contours. The PGF and CF point in
opposite directions and have the same strength. The total
force, the net force, is zero. The winds would blow in a
straight line at constant speed. Since the CF is
perpendicular and to the right of the wind, this is a northern
hemisphere chart.
We add friction in the second picture. It points in a
direction opposite the wind and can only slow the wind
down. The strength of the frictional force depends on wind
speed (no frictional force if the wind is calm) and the type of
surface the wind is blowing over (less friction when wind blows
over the ocean, more frictional force when the wind is blowing
over land).
Slowing the wind weakens the CF and it can no longer balance the
PGF (3rd figure). The stronger PGF causes the wind to turn
and start to blow across the contours toward Low. This is
shown in the 4th figure. Eventually the CF and Frictional
force, working together, can balance out the PGF.
The net force would again equal zero and the wind would blow in
a straight line at constant speed across the contours toward low
pressure.
What we've learned from the straight contour example,
namely that the winds will blow across the contours toward low
pressure can be applied to a curved contour pattern. This figure wasn't shown in class.
If you take a small little
piece of a curved pattern and magnify it, it will look
straight.
Now our last step, surface winds blowing around H and L in
the NH and SH.
It is easy to figure out which of the figures are
centers of low pressure (the wind blows inward toward the center
of the picture) The winds are spiraling inward in the top
and bottom examples (1 and 3). These must be surface
centers of low pressure. The winds are spiraling outward
from the centers of high pressure (2 and 4).
Now you probably don't want to figure out which of these are
northern and which are southern hemisphere pictures. It is
probably best to remember one of the pictures. Remember in
1, for example, that surface
winds spin counterclockwise and spiral inward around centers
of low pressure in the northern hemisphere (something
we learned early in the semester). Then remember that
winds spin in the other direction and blow outward around high
pressure in the northern hemisphere (2). The spinning
directions of the winds reverse when you move from the northern
to the southern hemisphere. Thus you find clockwise
spinning winds and inward motion around low pressure (3) and
counterclockwise and outward spiraling winds around high
pressure in the southern hemisphere.
Converging winds cause air to rise. Rising air expands and
cools and can cause clouds to form. Clouds and stormy
weather are associated with surface low pressure in both
hemispheres. Diverging winds created sinking wind motions
and result in clear skies.
Next we had a short look at the cause of the Coriolis
force. This is a little confusing. The pictures that
follow aren't in the ClassNotes.
Imagine
something flies over Tucson. It travels straight
from west to east at constant speed. You
would,
more
or
less
subconsciously,
plot
its path relative to the ground.
The
next
figure
shows
the
path
that the object would appear to follow as it passed over
the city.
Here's the path the moving
object would appear to follow relative to the
ground. Based on this straight line, constant speed
trajectory you'd conclude there was no net force acting on
the object (and again no net force doesn't mean there
aren't any forces, just that they all cancel each other
out so the total force is zero).
In this second picture the
object flies by overhead just as it did in the previous
picture. In this picture, however, the ground is moving
(don't worry about what might be causing the ground to
move).
It's kind of like walking across the moving sidewalk at an
airport with wet paint on your feet. What sort of track
would you leave behind?
In the case of the object flying by overhead
The path, relative to the ground, would look something like
this. It would no longer appear to be moving
from W to E but rather from the NW toward the SE. It's
still straight line motion at constant speed, though,
so you conclude there was no net force acting on the object.
Now the ground is moving and
also spinning. The object's
motion hasn't changed.
The path of the object plotted on the
ground appears to be curved. But remember that's
relative to the ground and the ground is spinning. We
could take the ground's motion into account or just ignore
it. In the latter case you'd conclude that there was a
net force perpendicular and to the right of the moving
object. This net force would be needed to explain the
curved path that the object appears to be following.
And that's what the Coriolis force is.
At most locations on the earth the
ground IS
rotating. This is most easily seen at the poles.
Imagine a piece of paper glued to the top of a globe.
As the globe spins the piece of paper will rotate. A piece
of paper glued to the globe at the equator won't spin, it will
flip over. At points in between the paper would spin and
flip, the motion gets complicated.
The easiest thing for us to do is to ignore or forget about
the fact that the ground on which we are standing is
rotating. We do still need to account for the curved paths
that moving objects will take when they move relative to the
earth's surface. That is what the Coriolis force does.
It's time for another 1S1P
Bonus Assignment. People have known that the earth
rotates for a long time. Foucault's Pendulum, the new 1S1P
topic, was the first demonstration that proved that the ground
we're standing on (at most locations anyways) is spinning.
Here's a photograph of a Foucault Pendulum at the Pantheon
in Paris (Foucault conducted his demonstration apparently at the
Paris Observatory).
Class kind of degenerated at this point because I tried
to squeeze a lot of material into the short amount of time left.
There's a common misconception involving the Coriolis
force. You might have heard that water spins in a
different direction when it drains from a sink or a toilet bowl
in the southern hemisphere than it does in the northern
hemisphere. You might also have heard that this is due to
the Coriolis force or the Coriolis effect.
The Coriolis force does cause winds to spin in opposite
directions around large scale high and low pressure centers in
the northern and southern hemisphere. The PGF starts the
air moving (in toward low, out and away from high pressure) then
the Coriolis force bends the wind to the right (N. hemisphere)
or to the left (S. hemisphere).
Here's what you end up with in the case of low pressure (you'll
find these figures on p. 130 in the photocopied ClassNotes):
Air starts to move inward
toward low pressure (the dots show this initial motion).
Then the Coriolis force causes it to turn to the right or left
depending on which hemisphere you're in. You should be
able to say which of the pictures above is the northern
hemisphere and which is the southern hemisphere picture.
The same kind of idea applies
to high pressure except that the air starts moving
outward. The Coriolis force then turns it to the right
or left.
There are situations where the PGF is much stronger than
the CF and the CF
can be ignored. A tornado is an example.
The PGF is much much stronger than the CF and the CF can be
ignored. Winds can blow around Low pressure because the
PGF points inward (though I haven't added any dots, it's a
little hard to figure out how something like this gets
started).
The wind can spin in either
direction in either hemisphere.
Note that without the CF, winds can't spin around High
pressure because there is nothing to provide the needed inward
force.
OK, what about water draining from sinks, buckets,
toilets etc. There's
just an inward pointing PGF, no CF. Water can spin
in either direction in either hemisphere. What
causes the inward pointing PGF?
The water at the edges of the spinning
water is a little deeper than in the middle. Since
pressure depends on weight, the pressure at the outer edge
of the spinning water is higher than in the center.
This creates the inward pointing pressure gradient (pressure
difference) force.
Here's a picture of the "Old Sow" whirlpool in the Bay of
Fundy and apparently the largest whirlpool in the Western
Hemisphere (source).
Water draining from a sink or toilet can spin in
either direction. It doesn't matter where you're
located.
But this something we should probably checkout for
ourselves, so here
is probably my favorite Optional Assignment of the
semester. You must submit the assignment by 5 pm on Friday
(send me an email or bring something to class this week).
Here's the answer to the question
embedded in today's notes. The figure below shows the
upper level winds that blow around H pressure in the SH
hemisphere.
Winds start to move outward and away from high
pressure. The CF then turns the wind to the left.
Winds end up spinning in a counterclockwise direction around
high pressure in the southern hemisphere.