We substitute in for
capacitance and next we recall that N Be q is
conductivity.
There is a linear relationship between isignal and V. The slope
of a plot of isignal vs
V should
provide an estimate of conductivity. And
again because we collect only one polarity of small ion
we aren't measuring the total conductivity. The
total conductivity depends on charge carriers of both
polarities.
The following figure shows a conventional ion
counter/conductivity meter design and an op-amp circuit
that could be used to measure the signal current
(Vout = signal current x R).
Note how the op-amp keeps the center conductor at
ground potential. Because the signal current is
very small, a large feedback resistor is needed in the
op-amp circuit (1013 ohms was used in
an "instrument" demonstrated in class).
When the outer cylinder is connected to +V as shown
above, positive charge carriers will move to the center
conductor and will produce the current signal shown
above. Because this is connected to the -
input of the amplifier we should see a negative polarity
output voltage. Similarly when the outer cylinder
is connected to -V, negative charge carriers will flow
to the center conductor, the signal current will reverse
polarity and the output voltage will be positive.
We did verify that this was happening with the crude
instrument that was operated in class. Here's a
summary of those measurements
The meter was first operated with 0 volts connected
to the outer cylinder. The amplifier output
voltage was 0.8 v. When the outer cylinder was
connected to +20 v, the output was -2.0. This is a
net change of -2.0 - 0.8 volts = - 2.8 v.
An output voltage of +3.0, a change of 3.0 - 0.8 = +2.2
volts, was observed when the outer cylinder was
connected to -20 volts.
Thus the instrument was operating more or less as
expected.
The photograph below is from a paper describing
measurements of air conductivity under thunderstorms in
Florida ("Ground
Level Measurements of Air Conductivities Under
Florida Thunderstorms," R.J. Blakeslee & E. P.
Krider, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 12947-12951, 1992).
Three conductivity meters were operated
simultaneously. One was connected to postive
voltage, one was grounded, and one was connected to
negative voltage, much as we did in the class
demonstration.
The sensors were kept in a wooden box (uncovered in the
photo) to protect them and the electronics from
rain. Air was drawn in through the three tubes at
right.
In this last figure we get a better idea of how this
instrument can function as either a conductivity meter
or an ion counter and how it transitions from one to the
other.
For a given rate of air flow through the cylindrical
capacitor we monitor the signal current as the potential
difference between the outer and inner conductors is
increased. As V increases small ions in a growing
volume of air are collected and measured. The
signal current increases. Eventually all of the
small ions are collected and the signal current flattens
out (saturates).
The slope of the linearly increasing, early portion
of the plot (shaded green above) provides an estimate of
conductivity. The amplitude of the
signal current, once it has flattened out (blue) can be
related to small ion concentration.
A common household ionization-type smoke detectors is
really just a very basic conductivity meter.
Alpha particles from
a small amount of radioactive Americium-241 ionizes
the air between two metal plates. The plates
are connected to a battery and the voltage
difference causes a weak current to flow between the
plates.
The current flowing through the ionization chamber
drops significantly when smoke enters the
chamber. This is because the charge carriers
quickly stick to any smoke particles that enter the
ionization chamber and suffer a large drop in their
electrical mobility. The drop in current is
sensed and used to sound the alarm.
The smoke detector was opened and the conductivity
chamber was placed near the opening of the class
conductivity meter. My thinking was that
some of the additional charge carriers created by
the Americium-241 source would be drawn into the
conductivity meter and we should be able to see a
larger output signal. That did seem to be the
case.
An to finish off another example of another
conductivity "meter", the so-called Nu-Klear
Detector.
The instructions read "Shake gently until some
beads float. Seek shelter at once if all beads
drop. Remain in shelter until some beads
float." Shaking the device charges the red
beads in the center cylinder (probably another
example of triboelectric charging). If
ionizing radiation is present (such as would be the
case following a nuclear explosion) the air in the
cylinder would become conducting and would
neutralize the charge on the beads. They'd
fall to the bottom of the device. You
can read more about it here.